Less common but neither is human readable, the following benchmarks are of the current implementation in comparison to the one in this pull request: ### Size Comparison | Input Size | Base64 Size | Z85 Size | Base64 Overhead | Z85 Overhead | |------------|-------------|----------|-----------------|--------------| | 100 B | 136 B | 125 B | 36.00% | 25.00% | | 1.00 KB | 1.34 KB | 1.25 KB | 33.59% | 25.00% | | 256.00 KB | 341.34 KB | 320.00 KB| 33.33% | 25.00% | | 1.00 MB | 1.33 MB | 1.25 MB | 33.33% | 25.00% | ### Encoding Performance | Input Size | Base64 | Z85 | Ratio (Z85/Base64) | |------------|---------------|------------|-------------------| | 100 B | 0.002ms | 0.001ms | 0.79x | | 1.00 KB | 0.019ms | 0.016ms | 0.82x | | 256.00 KB | 7.121ms | 6.222ms | 0.87x | | 1.00 MB | 86.522ms | 52.788ms | 0.61x | ### Decoding Performance | Input Size | Base64 | Z85 | Ratio (Z85/Base64) | |------------|---------------|------------|-------------------| | 100 B | 0.006ms | 0.002ms | 0.37x | | 1.00 KB | 0.028ms | 0.019ms | 0.67x | | 256.00 KB | 10.564ms | 7.609ms | 0.72x | | 1.00 MB | 62.924ms | 30.164ms | 0.48x |
This issue appears to be discussing a feature request or bug report related to the repository. Based on the content, it seems to be still under discussion. The issue was opened by edde746 and has received 3 comments.